On being required to write my first critical book review for an upper level history course I was filled with questions as were many of my peers.I was aware that the discourse is different between disciplines and that each discipline has its own unique requirements.In order to review a book on history it is essential to have some information on the subject, the region, and the period.
On being required to write my first critical book review for an upper level history course I was filled with questions as were many of my peers.I was aware that the discourse is different between disciplines and that each discipline has its own unique requirements.In order to review a book on history it is essential to have some information on the subject, the region, and the period.Tags: No Homework ResearchBuy Cheap Term PapersHuman Resource Management Case Studies With QuestionsInspirational Weight Loss EssaysProblem Solving For KindergartenMagazine Publisher Business PlanSample Introduction Paragraph For Research PaperResearch Proposal GuideAbortions Pros Cons Essay
The review is critical in that it discusses and evaluates the significance of this new information.
Book reviews also provide the historian with a thumbnail sketch of the contents - that may be very useful in research work.
1 Biographical information about the credibility, and expertise of the author must be taken into consideration.
Who is the author, what is his or her background, how does the authors background affect his or her writing? Is the argument well supported, with good documentation or does it have contradictions? What is new or different about this book, or does it offer anything new?
Education, class, ethnicity, nationality, gender, and political or religious affiliations may affect the authors expertise, bias, or interpretation. Does the author present new information or evidence?
Is the author an authority or qualified to write on the subject. Does the author raise new issues or leave unanswered questions for other scholars?Historiography is the history of writing on a particular topic.The historical source under review is usually secondary, that is, it is about an event in history that the author has contributed some new information.Many of us had never written a critical book review for history, and not all of us were history majors.A number of students dropped out of the course after writing their first critical book review in history simply because they did not know what was required and did not conduct the research to find out.You might have to read the whole book in some cases to determine what the authors thesis is.Watch out for transitions or verbs that imply proof. An historical book, paper or essay, such as a critical book review is an argument. Books such as Anthony Westons, A Rulebook for Arguments, or Trudy Goviers, A Practical Study of Argument, are very helpful if you are unsure of what an argument is.Journals are also a good place to find this information and to look for scholarly book reviews that will also help you understand the form, and give you an idea of what your review should look like. The book review is simply an essay with three parts: an introduction, a body, and a conclusion.The three parts of the critical book review for the historian are: who wrote it, why did they write it, and what do they have to offer. Arguments are intended to extend our knowledge, and also can be described as having three parts: a premise, supporting evidence, and a conclusion.The critical book review in history is unique to the discipline and a skill that is expected to be mastered by history students after their first year.Understanding what The purpose of the critical book review for history is to share information about an historical topic - it is not a book report that summarizes the content.